The following letter appeared in todays Opelika-Auburn News:
To the Editor:
In his letter on June 19, Edzard van Santen quotes the saying that one persons right to swing his fist ends where another persons nose begins.
Well and good; but what puzzles me is that he cites this saying as though its meant to be a critique of libertarianism. On the contrary, that saying encapsulates the essence of libertarianism.
In the 19th century, Herbert Spencer stated the same principle less metaphorically: Each has freedom to do all that he wills provided that he infringes not the equal freedom of any other. And in the 20th century, Murray Rothbard explained it more fully: No one may threaten or commit violence (aggress) against another mans person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defensively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no violence may be employed against a nonaggressor. Here is the fundamental rule from which can be deduced the entire corpus of libertarian theory.
Van Santen also quotes the saying that no one is an island, again as though this conflicted with libertarianism. But libertarianism is the only political philosophy that actually takes seriously the idea that no one is an island.
Other ideologies assume, explicitly or implicitly, that human beings are inherently atomistic, with naturally conflictual interests, and so that society needs to have order imposed on it by top-down authority. Libertarians, by contrast, have traditionally rejected this atomistic vision of society, emphasizing that a human being is, in Emersons words, all made of hooks and eyes, and links himself naturally to his brothers.
Its precisely because we recognize that no one is an island that social order arises spontaneously and organically through voluntary, nonhierarchical relations among equals that we are libertarians in the first place.
Roderick T. Long
Im not sure why they a) waited nearly two weeks to publish it, after van Santen had already gone a round with Leland Yeager; b) removed my quotation marks on the Spencer quote, while keeping them on the Rothbard and Emerson quotes; or c) published my letter under the title We were libertarians in the first place, thus tearing my closing phrase out of the context that gave it sense. But hey, its the OA News.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen an editorial page editor who didn’t fuck up letters to the editor.
Really nice summation, Roderick. And turning the charge of atomism against the Hobbesians is delectably elegant.
For anyone who’s interested, Van Santen’s letter: