Rand Unbound, Part 7

Two more Cato Unbound posts from me, one a reply to Mike’s latest on whether it’s conceptually incoherent to be indifferent to one’s own interests, and one a belated response to Doug’s earlier question about religion.

, , , , , , ,

2 Responses to Rand Unbound, Part 7

  1. MBH February 3, 2010 at 7:01 pm #

    I don’t see how your approach doesn’t lift the concept as high as imaginable. Regardless of one’s particular religion.

    Whenever I have theological discussions with my Christian friends, I ask them “what is God’s logic?” And that serves as a koan. But they tend to reject the question. If the word ‘Jesus’ isn’t included in the question, then it’s automatically blaspheme. I’m so glad our country has insitutionalized polylogism.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes