A reader tipped me off that Noam Chomsky has agreed to answer the top-rated questions submitted via this reddit page; the reader suggested that I condense my Chomskys Augustinian Anarchism gripes into a question.
So I did. Heres my question for Chomsky:
Although as an anarchist you favour a stateless society in the long run, youve argued that it would be a mistake to work for the elimination of the state in the short run, and that indeed we should be trying to strengthen the state right now, because its needed as a check on the power of large corporations.
Yet the tendency of a lot of anarchist research your own research most definitely included, though I would also mention in particular Kevin Carsons has been to show that the power of large corporations derives primarily from state privilege (which, together with the fact that powerful governments tend to get captured by concentrated private interests at the expense of the dispersed public, would seem to imply that the most likely beneficiary of a more powerful state is going to be the same corporate elite were trying to oppose).
If business power both derives from the state and is so good at capturing the state, why isnt abolishing the state a better strategy for defeating business power than enhancing the states power would be?
Users can vote comments upward or downward on the list; so if youd like to see Chomsky answer the above question, go here and try to boost it up the list. (Or ask one of your own, of course!)