Rand Unbound, Part 7

Two more Cato Unbound posts from me, one a reply to Mike’s latest on whether it’s conceptually incoherent to be indifferent to one’s own interests, and one a belated response to Doug’s earlier question about religion.

, , , , , , ,

2 Responses to Rand Unbound, Part 7

  1. MBH February 3, 2010 at 7:01 pm #

    I don’t see how your approach doesn’t lift the concept as high as imaginable. Regardless of one’s particular religion.

    Whenever I have theological discussions with my Christian friends, I ask them “what is God’s logic?” And that serves as a koan. But they tend to reject the question. If the word ‘Jesus’ isn’t included in the question, then it’s automatically blaspheme. I’m so glad our country has insitutionalized polylogism.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes