The premise of this movie seems to be a cross between Logans Run and the original Repo Man. The idea, I gather from the trailer, is that in the near future, patients in need of an organ transplant can purchase artificial organs on an installment plan but if they dont keep up their payments, then their organs can be bloodily repossessed. The protagonist, Jude Law, is an organ repo man who has no misgivings about his job until, after a job gone wrong, he wakes up with an organ transplant he cant afford and ends up on the run, pursued by his former partner, Forest Whitaker.
I thought Id weigh in early on what I take to be the libertarian perspective on this. Some libertarians may say that these organ repo men are simply enforcing contracts, and so are behaving legitimately. But on my view (elaborated here, here, here, and here; cf. also Rothbard and Barnett), contracts involve the conditional transfer of alienable rights, while rights over bodily parts (whether made of meat or not) are inalienable so long as theyre within the body. (Moreover, there are limits on what one can do in recovering alienable property too.) So my verdict is that what the organ repo men are doing is not libertarianly legitimate.