In the most recent episode of Arrow, Cayden James, the show’s current main antagonist, tells his followers:
The Presocratic philosopher Thales of Miletus, known as the father of science, believed that for any event there was a natural cause, even if we couldn’t see it; and he thought that with perfect knowledge, man could control anything – everything.
Um … citation needed?
I just got back from seeing Atomic Blonde, which was a lot of fun (especially for those of us who came of age in the 80s). But it really made me sad once again that Charlize Theron never got her wish to play Dagny Taggart, because she would have been perfect.
But hey, when Daniel Craig finally stops teasing and finally gives up playing Bond, Theron could totally replace him.
Some quick comments on Jeff Deist’s latest:
[W]hile libertarians enthusiastically embrace markets, they have for decades made the disastrous mistake of appearing hostile to family, to religion, to tradition, to culture, and to civic or social institution[s] – in other words, hostile to civil society itself.
This is a dubious package-deal. Many libertarians have been hostile to religion (often for good reason). Hostility to family per se is not terribly common (leaving aside Molyneux), though hostility to family-based oppression is. As for tradition, libertarians – like everybody else – embrace some traditions and reject others.
But the real howler is the alleged hostility to “culture, and … civic or social institutions.” Where are there any examples or evidence of this?
[I]t is reasonable to believe that a more libertarian society would be less libertine and more culturally conservative – for the simple reason that as the state shrinks in importance and power, the long-suppressed institutions of civil society grow in importance and power. And in a more libertarian society, it’s harder to impose the costs of one’s lifestyle choices on others.
As I see it, this gets things precisely backwards. States impose uniformity; civil society, freed of state control, caters to diversity. It’s true, to be sure, that a libertarian society makes it “harder to impose the costs of one’s lifestyle choices on others” – but what is cultural conservatism if not a massive attempt to impose the costs of lifestyle choices on others? (On this point, see my critique of Rothbard on patriarchy here.)
If any evidence is needed of the dangers of cultural conservatism, notice that Deist feels moved to invoke an actual Nazi slogan in his closing paragraph:
In other words, blood and soil and God and nation still matter to people. Libertarians ignore this at the risk of irrelevance.
In response to this, I can’t help thinking of these lines from C. S. Lewis’s The Last Battle:
And all the Calormenes banged the flats of their swords on their shields and shouted, “Tash! Tash! The great god Tash! Inexorable Tash!” (There was no nonsense about “Tashlan” now.)
So end all attempts to combine liberty with its opposite.
13th Doctor announcement, part 1:
13th Doctor announcement, part 2:
One fan’s reaction to watching part 2:
My daughter watching the #DoctorWho announcement. #doctor13 #DoctorWho13 pic.twitter.com/eX0w1rW4E9
— 🏳️🌈Jenny Trout (@Jenny_Trout) July 16, 2017
So Carlos Valdes and Tiffany Smith have been seen in the same place at the same time:
Well, there goes that theory.
So apparently Rothbard is Doctor Who now:
Well, that explains his conversion from lefty to paleo: it was a regeneration! Kind of like from Five to Six.