
The Empirical Me
I’m Roderick T. Long, Professor of Philosophy at Auburn University. I’m an Aristotelean/Wittgensteinian in philosophy and a left-libertarian market anarchist in social theory. (More about me here.) This blog, Austro-Athenian Empire, is a continuation of my earlier blog, archived here.
PI Complex Anarchy Spencer Labortarian IP Science Fiction Jove's Witnesses Industriels Financial Saga Lapsus Linguae Democracy Antiracism Science Fact Left-Libertarian Thank You Please May I Have Another Left and Right Online Texts Praxeology Unethical Philosophy The Thin Blue Line Can't Stop the Muzak Humor Therapeutic State Arma Virumque Paterson Rand Guest Blogs Juvenilia Conflation Debate LGBT Personal Cato Encyclopedia Antiquity Molinari/C4SS Space Elseblogs Boring Administrative Stuff Ethics Free the Earth Terror Resistance Is Not Futile No Borders Feminism
Copyright © 2012 Austro-Athenian Empire.
“The Comedian is dead.”
Roderick, if you were aruguing with Jon on Mars, what would you have told him? I suppose that he would say that it that the events that were to follow were inevitable. But you’ve argued in favor of the free will hypothesis, and (if I recall correctly) that the deterministic theory is incoherent.
It’d just be good to see a review of Watchmen from a libertarian philosopher’s perspective.
Jon’s situation as described is incoherent — “I’m deciding to do X because I see that X is already what’s going to happen.” The direction of fit is messed up.
Oh by the way, here’s the essay of mine on why I think determinism is incoherent.
There is a book, Watchmen and Philosophy: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watchmen-Philosophy-Rorschach-Blackwell-Culture/dp/0470396857/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234045247&sr=8-1
That’s a silly position. Free will cannot exist without determinism.
OK, I’ll bite; what’s the argument?
If determined how is will free?