Sign seen in front of a church near my home:
TOO HOT TO KEEP
CHANGING SIGN
SIN BAD
JESUS GOOD
CHANGING SIGN
SIN BAD
JESUS GOOD
Sign seen in front of a church near my home:
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Point…if it weren’t for “Sin” then there would be NO need for Jesus, soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo how can the thingy which makes Jesus’ existence have a purpose be “bad” ?
“if it weren’t for “Sin” then there would be NO need for Jesus”
That’s only the case on certain Christologies. Some see the incarnation as the main revelatory purpose, something that would have happened in some manner regardless of sin.
Maybe they mean “Sinbad Jesus good.” As in Sinbad the sailor. After all, Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water, and he spent a long time watching from his lonely wooden tower.
Or so I hear.