I have a follow-up post at BHL: Twelve Theses on Libertarian Eudaimonism.
Archive | February, 2012
Transatlantic Translation
Some differences between British and American English are fairly obvious, like the different uses of brilliant, pissed, and knock up (though the American meaning of the last, at least, has now made its way fairly well into British usage). I want to talk about a couple that are a little more nuanced.
One is the difference between the British and American usage of meant to. Consider the following two sentences.
This décor is meant to look Egyptian.
The weather is meant to be lovely in Capri this time of year.
The first sentence sounds fine in American English, though an American would be slightly more likely to say supposed to. But the second is something an American just wouldnt say; here only supposed to would do (unless one is referring to the gods purposes in arranging Capris weather). But it sounds quite normal in British English. The difference is that in American English, meant to suggests somethings being intended, while supposed to can mean either that or what is simply taken to be the case which is how meant to works in British English.
(Actually I think the difference shows up in the first sentence too; my sense is that in American English This décor is meant to look Egyptian stresses the intentionality, as if to explain that the Egyptian appearance isnt an accident.)
The other difference concerns the word right. Theres a fair bit of overlap between the British and American uses here, but there are also differences, and the particular one I have in mind is nicely displayed in the following video clip of the opening scene from the original BBC version of Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. (The scene is also charming in its own right and incidentally does a nice job of instantly making it visually clear, to readers of the book, which actors are playing which characters.)
Now in American English, if you begin with Right! then you have to be responding to something someone else has said; you cant just start off with it, the way you can in British English. What does work in American English the way right works in British English is okay; it would sound perfectly natural for an American to begin a meeting with Okay, lets get started but not with Right, lets get started.
By contrast, Okay, we shall start as opposed to Okay, lets get started would sound a bit off in American English, but my (fallible) sense is that Allelines we shall start is not quite natural in British English either; the Alleline character is supposed and indeed meant to be something of a pompous ass, and this might be reflected in unnatural speech patterns.
A Matter of Gravity
Wondering what really happened in the Sherlock finale? Click here (but only if youve seen The Reichenbach Fall). (CHT Mark Gatiss.)
The (Very) Thin Green Line
The Guardians of the Universe, the bosses of the Green Lantern Corps, have divided the universe into 3600 sectors, each under the jurisdiction of one (originally) or two (currently) Green Lanterns.
This is obviously absurd. But lets pause for a moment to consider just how absurd it really is.
Current estimates place the number of galaxies in the universe at somewhere between 100 billion and 500 billion. So lets say 300 billion. That means that each sector has, on average, about 80 million galaxies in it.
Suppose youre a Green Lantern scanning your sector for signs of trouble. Suppose further, absurdly, that scanning an entire galaxy takes only one second. At that rate, it will still take you two and a half years to scan your entire sector.
Just watch this video and think about trying to police the entire universe with a force of 3600 (or 7200) cops:
Now back in the 1970s there was some confusion at DC about the scope of the Guardians authority; while usually described as the Guardians of the Universe, they were occasionally described instead as merely the Guardians of the Galaxy (not to be confused with Marvels super-team of the same name). There was even a silly plot point once where the bad guys removed Earth from the Green Lantern Corpss jurisdiction by yanking it out of the Milky Way.
This certainly makes more sense, but still not much. The number of stars in the Milky Way is thought to be roughly the same as the number of galaxies in the universe; so itd still take two and a half years to scan a single sector, if scanning at the rate of one star system per second.
No wonder theres never a Green Lantern around when you need one.
Scholastic Achievement Test
More juvenilia: Whether What Is Transcendent Is Dependent (unsuccessful parody of medieval philosophy, age 19). Adam Smith says somewhere that a sculpture of an animal is more impressive than a sculpture of a chair, because a sculpture of a chair isnt sufficiently different from an actual chair; a similar criticism applies here.
Cordial and Sanguine, Part 19
I have a new post up at BHL: Eudaimonist Libertarianism. Not too hot, not too cold like lukewarm porridge, its just right!