Archive | Uncategorized

Valli Girl

The 1942 Italian film version of We the Living (Alida Valli, Rossano Brazzi, and Fosco Giachetti) – the best of the Rand movies, and by Rand’s own admission better than the Rand-scripted The Fountainhead – is finally out on dvd, and this version includes some cool extras.

We the Living

First, there’s 45 minutes’s worth of the hour or so of scenes that Rand chose to delete from the authorised version. Some were deleted for ideological reasons (e.g., anticapitalist and antisemitic rants that the fascist authorities insisted on adding to the script) and others for artistic reasons (for example, the film changed Andrei’s death from a suicide to a murder, and Rand changed it back). Still others were subplots that, though not inaccurate to the novel, Rand evidently regarded as distracting from the main plot. (I do wish there were also a version available of the whole movie as originally made.)

Second, there’s a short documentary about the history of the film, the highlight of which is an interview with Massimo Ferrara, general manager of the studio that made the film, and a chief source of the claim that the movie was eventually banned by the same government that had originally authorised it. (R. W. Bradford has questioned the accuracy of Ferrara’s story; the points Bradford raised are worth thinking about, though I don’t find them as compelling as he did.)

There’s also a brief visual clip of a funny Rand letter I don’t recall having read before, where she jokes about having no non-intellectual activities to report.

The copy on the back of the dvd is misleading in one respect; it promises to include “The Original Ending and Why Ayn Rand Changed It.” The original ending is included in the “deleted scenes” feature, but there’s no discussion of why she nixed it. Still, it’s obvious enough once one sees it; the whole point of that scene in the book is what Kira is thinking and feeling, but in the movie you can only see a pale figure in the distance and can barely even tell it’s Kira.

Some of Rand’s other hard-to-find movies are also available now on dvd, albeit in lower-quality versions that seem to have been copied off tv broadcasts – from the excellent Love Letters (Joseph Cotten and Jennifer Jones; full script by Rand, albeit adapting someone else’s novel), through the uneven but still worthwhile You Came Along (Robert Cummings and Lizabeth Scott; Rand revising someone else’s script), to the disappointing Night of January 16th (Robert Preston, Ellen Drew, and Nils Asther; a barely recognisable adaptation of Rand’s Broadway play).

In mostly unrelated news (not completely unrelated, since Welles co-starred with We the Living’s Valli and Love Letters’ Cotten in one of my favourite movies, The Third Man, as well as playing a character in Citizen Kane analogous to Raymond Massey’s character in The Fountainhead), I can’t tell whether this movie is any good, but Christian McKay definitely does an impressive job of capturing Orson Welles.


The Labyrinth of Fate, With Coffee

Puppets in Hell

Puppets in Hell

I’m back from the APS – which was fun, as usual.

For those in the Auburn area, there’ll be another session of caffeinated philosophy tomorrow at 5:00 at the Gnu’s Room (next to Amsterdam Café, near the corner of Gay and Samford). This time I’ll be part of a roundtable discussing free will; check out the poster here.

Milton in Paradise Lost describes the fallen angels in Hell enjoying a similar discussion:

Others apart sat on a hill retir’d,
In thoughts more elevate, and reasoned high
Of Providence, Foreknowledge, Will and Fate,
Fixed fate, free will, foreknowledge absolute;
And found no end, in wand’ring mazes lost.

But Milton’s fallen angels didn’t have the benefit of the Gnu’s Room’s excellent coffee, so I’m sure we’ll get it all sorted out.


Intermittency

To anyone wondering why I haven’t been reading and responding to blog comments as much lately as I usually do (or why I’m even farther behind on email than usual) – both my car and my home computer are currently malfunctioning, plus I’m teaching a course overload this semester, so my time on the computer is limited to a few hours caught between classes at the office. Hope to have at least some of that fixed soon.


Justice As Squareness

The Pythagoreans held that “justice is a square number.” There’s dispute about what this meant. But just in case I ever decide to write about it, I hereby lay claim to first formulation (at least I can’t find precedent on the internet) of the ideal title for any such discussion: “Justice As Squareness.”

(Note: by laying claim I don’t mean, of course, forbidding anyone else to use it. I just mean that if I do eventually decide to use it, and someone else has used it in the meantime, they won’t be able to claim that I swiped it from them.)

(Note deux: and for those wondering why this title is ideal – “Justice As Fairness” is the title or partial title of four (well, three and a half) different works by John Rawls, as well as a phrase used frequently throughout, and made famous by, his entire œuvre.)


Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes