By the way, the fact that I link only to those BHL posts that are by members of the Molinari/C4SS/ALL axis most definitely doesn’t mean that I think those are the only entries worth reading! It’s just that I reckon, on empirical grounds, that some of my readers will be interested in all the posts there, and others will be interested just in the Molinari/C4SS/ALL ones; and the first group can just subscribe to BHL’s RSS feed, whereas my links serve the interests of the second group.
Author Archive | Roderick
Cordial and Sanguine, Part 15
Gary has a piece up at BHL on Violence, Wars, and States.
He seems to be against them.
Have a Cream Tea On Me
A frustratingly brief clip from the next series of Sherlock:
Liberty Mutual, Part 2
I’ve previously mentioned C4SS’s new feature, “Mutual Exchange,” which began with a piece by Anthony Gregory.
Kevin Carson’s reply to Anthony is now up.
I should note in passing that Kevin’s distinction between reductio ad absurdum arguments and arguments by analogy is very important, as these two are frequently conflated – particularly by those invoking Godwin’s Law. (For a discussion of the closely related conflation of arguments by counterexample with arguments by analogy, see Mike Watkins here.)
Cordial and Sanguine, Part 14
Also at BHL, Gary Chartier reviews Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch’s Declaration of Independents: How Libertarian Politics Can Fix What’s Wrong With America.
Cordial and Sanguine, Part 13
I have a new post up at BHL: Libertarians In Jackboots? It’s a reply to a piece by Michael Lind arguing that libertarians are apologists for autocracy.