This story is a couple of years old, but I missed it the first time.
I read that book in senior year of high school; but I read it in French, and my French wasnt that great at the time, so I dont actually remember anything about it. But if it ticks off Sarko, it has my vote. (Well, unless that implies endorsing Dominique Strauss-Kahn ….)
Maybe the feeling is: everybody nowadays knows that Mars and Venus are a) uninhabited, and b) inhospitable to human life, so audiences wont buy seeing human heroes without protective suits running about in Martian or Venusian cities having adventures with the natives. If so, I think this greatly overestimates audiences concern with scientific accuracy and/or underestimates their willingness to suspend disbelief. (After all, Avatar audiences bought this.)
On the contrary, I would think that the phrase John Carter of Mars which (even for people whove never heard of the books) promises science-fiction action-adventure is a bigger draw than John Carter, which for most audiences suggests nothing in particular. (And ditto, mutatis mutandis, for Carson of Venus.)
Another suggestion is that the studio shortened the title in order to be able to establish IP rights to the name John Carter. (They already own John Carter of Mars.) But it seems to me they could do that just by releasing a five-minute animated tie-in called John Carter, and leaving the movie with the cooler title.
Actually Id prefer the proper title, A Princess of Mars. But Id be willing to bet that some studio exec thought, Male audiences will be scared off by a film with princess in the title; theyll think its some girly rainbow thing.
[Police officers] need to move quickly, in split seconds, without giving a lot of thought to what the adverse consequences for them might be. … [A]nything thats going to have a chilling effect on an officer moving an apprehension that he’s being videotaped and may be made to look bad could cost him or some citizen their life. Jim Pasco, Fraternal Order of Police
a) The second season of Steven Moffats Sherlock has begun filming, and the titles of the new episodes have now been announced. The titles arguably count as spoilers for anyone familiar with the source material, so click at your own risk.
b) Ive had a love-hate relationship with this song since my childhood. The music is haunting; the lyrics are imbecilic:
If you dont remember that song from The Wizard of Oz, its because during the 60s and 70s Disney produced several additional Oz records; the three I had as a kid (perhaps the only three made?) were based on L. Frank Baums The Scarecrow of Oz and The Tin Woodman of Oz, and Ruth Plumly Thompsons The Cowardly Lion of Oz. (One of the accompanying storybooks, I forget which, seized my youthful imagination by featuring a smoking hot Ozma who bore no resemblance to the one in the books.) [12/4/13 addendum: I misremembered; it was Polychrome, not Ozma, who was thus pulchritudinously portrayed, in the Tin Woodman storybook.] In addition to the songs from the Wizard of Oz movie, the record pictured in the video contains some, though not all, of the songs from these additional records.
c) Ive blogged previously about Moon Europa, an intriguing indy science fiction film I first saw previewed at Asheville’s Revoluticon back in 2006. The site and trailers I previously linked to are gone now (and inaccessible even by Wayback, thanks to Killer Robots). According to IMDB, the film was released in 2009. But elsewhere I read that what came out in 2009 was a shorter version, now called Solatrium, and the makers are still hoping to expand the story into a feature-length film, Moon Europa.
The old trailers are frustratingly gone, but two new trailers, one labeled Solatrium and the other Moon Europa (though they are evidently the same movie), are available: