Both Caps (like Daniel Sanchez) and Socks (like Magpie Killjoy) aligned, as so often, in a common conflationism have accused Macks of trying to pull a bait-and-switch by redefining capitalism to mean corporatism.
But if you look at what the Macks actually say, the accusation wont fly. Macks have distinguished a variety of different meanings of the term capitalism in contemporary use and our chief preference has been to use capitalism not to mean corporatism, but rather to mean a social condition which Macks believe is caused by corporatism, but which Socks (and some Caps) believe is caused by free markets. See, for example, Gary here and Charles here. (And of course this is essentially the way that individualist anarchists have been using the term for the past two centuries.)
If youre going to attack us, at least attack us for what we actually say (and maybe even engage with our arguments for what we say).