Honour or Face?

In the GOP debate tonight Ron Paul had an exchange with Huckabee (I think – one of those doofuses anyway) which ended with Huckabee saying the U.S. had to stay in Iraq to save its “honour,” and Paul replying by asking how many more lives had to be lost for the U.S. to “save face.”

On Hannity & Colmes they just now replayed the exchange – cutting off just before Paul’s reply.

Gotta love that fair-and-balanced Fox ….

, , ,

4 Responses to Honour or Face?

  1. Administrator September 5, 2007 at 10:24 pm #

    They just did it a second time!

  2. Black Bloke September 5, 2007 at 10:41 pm #

    I can’t wait for this confrontation between Paul and Hannity!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Rad Geek People’s Daily 2007-09-06 – Marching orders - September 6, 2007

    […] Ron Paul is perfectly capable of making sharp moral arguments against the war. He does during the course of the debate, as in his later exchange with Mike Huckabee. But he doesn’t do it here, and that’s a damn shame. Taking a moral stand against domination and senseless slaughter, in the face of bellowing blowhards such as these takes courage. But instead Ron Paul makes a legal argument, which amounts to ignoring the demands of human decency in order to throw a scrap of paper in their faces and making legalistic excuses. (Would a formal declaration of war, which would certainly have been granted if Presidents were still in the habit of asking for such things, have somehow excused the killing, maiming, and ruining of hundreds of thousands of innocent people by this war?) […]

  2. The Island of Doctor Moreau (2.2) » Blog Archive » Marching orders - September 20, 2007

    […] Ron Paul is perfectly capable of making sharp moral arguments against the war. He does during the course of the debate, as in his later exchange with Mike Huckabee. But he doesn’t do it here, and that’s a damn shame. Taking a moral stand against domination and senseless slaughter, in the face of bellowing blowhards such as these takes courage. But instead Ron Paul makes a legal argument, which amounts to ignoring the demands of human decency in order to throw a scrap of paper in their faces and making legalistic excuses. (Would a formal declaration of war, which would certainly have been granted if Presidents were still in the habit of asking for such things, have somehow excused the killing, maiming, and ruining of hundreds of thousands of innocent people by this war?) […]

Leave a Reply to Administrator Click here to cancel reply.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes