Shawn Wilbur announces a new Mutualism.info blog.
One might say it represents the shallower end for newcomers, while his regular blog represents the deeper end.
(I use the phrase “his regular blog” with trepidation, as he has a few more.)
Recent Comments
- D. F. Linton on Cordial and Sanguine, Part 55: Istanbul Redux
- Roderick on It’s What’s in the Dark – It’s What’s Always in the Dark
- Cordial and Sanguine, Part 56: The Mind Cannot Foresee Its Own Eternal Recurrence, Recurrence the Second on Cordial and Sanguine, Part 53: The Mind Cannot Foresee Its Own Eternal Recurrence
- Roderick on Galloping Around the Cosmos Is a Game for the Young
- Ashton on An Agorist in the Agora, with Business in Byzantium
- Ashton on Words Mean Stuff
- Mariana on That’s Just Wrong
- Irfan Khawaja on An Agorist in the Agora, with Business in Byzantium
- Brandon on Galloping Around the Cosmos Is a Game for the Young
- William Grigg on Galloping Around the Cosmos Is a Game for the Young
Meta
-
Recent Posts
- Cordial and Sanguine, Part 56: The Mind Cannot Foresee Its Own Eternal Recurrence, Recurrence the Second by Roderick
- Cordial and Sanguine, Part 55: Istanbul Redux by Roderick
- 10 + 11 by Roderick
- KSR FTW by Roderick
- Words Mean Stuff by Roderick
- Galloping Around the Cosmos Is a Game for the Young by Roderick
- Cordial and Sanguine, Part 54: Bleeding Heart Libertarianism in Istanbul by Roderick
- An Agorist in the Agora, with Business in Byzantium by Roderick
- That’s Just Wrong by Roderick
- Molinari Unbound! – Septième Soirée by Roderick
8 Comments
Thanks, Roderick. But I’m still partial to the Seventh Day Adventists.
… at least they come to my door and knock first and don’t walk on the grass.
I’m certainly partial to some Seventh Day Adventists.
Trade, flea markets, unions, co-ops, the back-to-the-land movement and so on are good. But a common ownership of the means of production is bad. I value my liberty and cherish the fruits of my labor, thank you very much. So yes, I’m partial to all manifestations of the freedom of religion over the Fifth Internationale any day.
Okay, but what does that have to do with mutualism? Mutualists don’t favour “common ownership of the means of production.”
Generally speaking, what is your opinion on mutualism?
Well, it comes in different flavours: Proudhon, Greene, Tucker, Lum, Kevin Carson, Francois Tremblay, and Shawn, for example, don’t all believe exactly the same thing. My views on property and value are closer to the agorist constellation than to the mutualist constellation, but I’m certainly closer in my outlook to the mutualists than to some agorists (I’m just not alongside certain agorists, if ya know what I mean) as well as to many anarcho-capitalists (e.g. in my fondness for worker management). And both agorism and mutualism are currently in a process of self-exploration and self-definition (with Shawn being in the forefront of the latter process).
Thanks for the plug, Roderick.
I would have had the trepidation at calling the Two-Gun Mutualism blog “regular,” which is why it seems to make sense to split off some of the content into specialized blogs.