The Old Rugged Cross

12thApr. × ’12
Genius.  Billionaire.  Playboy.  Philanthropist.

Genius. Billionaire. Playboy. Philanthropist.

For some reason I’m on the mailing list of an outfit called “Conservative Action Alerts.” (They seem more libertarian than the conservative mainstream, so that’s probably the connection.) Their latest missive complains that the word “individualism” has been “poisoned by deceptive propaganda that disparaged it as ‘rugged.’”

Well, not exactly. “Rugged individualism” was introduced as a positive term, either coined or popularised by Herbert Hoover (who liked to pose, at least sometimes, as a free-market type even though his actual policies were straight-up big-government dirigism). Admittedly it’s often used pejoratively now, but that’s mainly due to the (ludicrous) perception that Hoover’s ineffective response to the Great Depression was somehow driven by individualism.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

11 Comments

  1. Posted April 12, 2012 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Firefox 11.0 Ubuntu;

    Individualism has a bad rep with me mainly because I associate it with free market ideology (which I despise). I always assumed “rugged” means “fit” in the “survival of the fittest” sense. So I either coined or popularized the term “thick individualism.” Thick individualism is to individualism as thick libertarianism is to libertarianism.

  2. Posted April 13, 2012 at 1:35 am | Permalink

    Safari iPad  iOS 4.2.1

    Actual disparagement would tap into “atomistic” or “autistic” individualism.

    • Posted April 13, 2012 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

      Safari MacIntosh

      Yes. Ignoring the fact that atomism is anti-indvidualist.

      • Posted April 13, 2012 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

        Chromium 18.0.1025.151 Linux

        How do you mean?

        • Posted April 13, 2012 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

          Safari MacIntosh

          See the opening section of this.

        • Posted April 13, 2012 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

          Chromium 18.0.1025.151 Linux

          Then what I want to say is: Conservatives themselves disparage individualism by claiming to represent it and — simultaneously — pushing policy that’s charged by atomistic views.

        • Posted April 14, 2012 at 12:30 am | Permalink

          Safari MacIntosh

          That’s because they’re really atomic-powered robots.

        • Posted April 14, 2012 at 1:06 am | Permalink

          Chromium 18.0.1025.151 Linux

          Do those come with ‘off’ switches?

    • Posted April 14, 2012 at 7:22 am | Permalink
      • Posted April 14, 2012 at 8:34 am | Permalink

        Chromium 18.0.1025.151 Linux

        I have Aspergers and I’m fine with “autistic economics.” I think it captures the blind-spot in “supply-side economics,” for instance. After all, autistics and neurotypical supply-siders both tend to miss the significance of others’ demands — though the latter does so abstractly and the former much more concretely.

  3. Posted April 19, 2012 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Safari MacIntosh

    When I said that Conservative Action Alerts “seem more libertarian than the conservative mainstream,” I was forgetting this.