5 responses to “How Roger Pilon Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Empire”

  1. Todd S.

    Chromium 8.0.552.237 Ubuntu/10.10

    I believe he was using “duplicity” in a projecting manner. As in his own duplicity in working for an ostensibly libertarian foundation while simultaneously licking the boots of every state functionary in the beltway.

  2. Brian N.

    Firefox 3.6.13 Windows 7

    He’s using it the same way Master Shake did in that one episode of Aqua Teen Hunger Force – “it’s the duplicitous edge we all walk,” – which is to say in a completely inappropriate manner.

    Perhaps he set up the element in his post that would make it understandable, but he edited it out or something like that. Perhaps he just liked the word. Treasonous would be incorrect, but duplicity provides the similar element of backstabbing and moral wretchedness. Yet another possibility is that he is indirectly referring to what this refers. One standard for Julian Assange, another standard for everyone else.

  3. Dissenting Libertarian Take on Wikileaks and Bradley Manning « LewRockwell.com Blog

    WordPress 3.0.4 XML-RPC

    [...] libertarianism, which one can hardly imagine Pilon subscribing to (see also Roderick Long’s How Roger Pilon Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Empire). Bookmark/Share « Previous: Homeland Security for the Home | LRC Home | LRC Blog | [...]

  4. Robert Hutchinson

    Safari Android 2.2;

    That’s … he’s … aaaaaaaagh.

    “Transparency has its place.” When properly approved by the secret-keepers, of course. Imagine the explosive consequences of Egyptians knowing their masters’ plans for them! Imagine how a lack of secrets could ruin America’s current successful peacemaking all over the world!

    (spits)

  5. rmangum

    MSIE 8.0 Windows Vista

    My favorite part is his reference to “delicate negotiations” between “American, Egyptian, and other officials.” This is the most salient aspect of the Egyptian uprising. Between this and Wayne Allyn Root’s denunciation of the protesters as “anarchists [if only!], communists, and Islamic extremists,” it’s clear that many in the libertarian establishment hate the ungodly rabble more than they hate the state.