<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jonah Sux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357461</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357461</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Iron Man 2&lt;/em&gt; didn&#039;t piss me off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Iron Man 2</em> didn&#8217;t piss me off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357442</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357442</guid>
		<description>Joe Kennedy&#039;s motivation was to keep the u.s., and more specifically his sons, out of a European war. This is well-documented, even by hawkish Kennedy hagiographers like Goodwin and anti-Kennedy types like Kessler. If Joe appeared &#039;friendly&#039; to the Nazis, it was because the American administration he worked for had taken the opposite stance. However, after Pearl, Kennedy became pro-war and offered his &#039;services&#039; in a telegraph to Roosevelt (which was essentially ignored).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Kennedy&#8217;s motivation was to keep the u.s., and more specifically his sons, out of a European war. This is well-documented, even by hawkish Kennedy hagiographers like Goodwin and anti-Kennedy types like Kessler. If Joe appeared &#8216;friendly&#8217; to the Nazis, it was because the American administration he worked for had taken the opposite stance. However, after Pearl, Kennedy became pro-war and offered his &#8216;services&#8217; in a telegraph to Roosevelt (which was essentially ignored).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Carson</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357440</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357440</guid>
		<description>I had a similar reaction to how the movie version of Harris&#039;s *Fatherland* bastardized it to make it more palatable to stoopid people.

Specifically, the point of divergence was changed from the Spring 1942 campaign in southern Russia to the D-Day invasion.   That&#039;s right, the failure of the latter was enough to turn the tide--never mind that Zhukov was getting ready to smash into Poland.  

Also, Joe Kennedy was sanitized from the somewhat Nazi-sympathetic right bastard that he was in the book (and in real life).  In the book, the reader was left hanging at the end before the Hitler-Kennedy summit ever took place, with it remaining an entirely open question whether photographic evidence of the Holocaust would change Joe&#039;s mind or simply provide fuel for some chuckles over cocktails with Hitler.  In the movie Joe sees the pictures,  starts weeping like Iron Eyes Cody at the sight of somebody littering, and orders his drive to turn the car around and leave Berlin.

Apparently the producer thought American audiences would be too fucking stupid to stand seeing a Kennedy--even a dirtbag like Joe--as friendly to Hitler.  Shit!  In real life, Joe Kennedy and Prescott Bush were probably fighting each other to steal the crematorium contract from I.G. Farben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar reaction to how the movie version of Harris&#8217;s *Fatherland* bastardized it to make it more palatable to stoopid people.</p>
<p>Specifically, the point of divergence was changed from the Spring 1942 campaign in southern Russia to the D-Day invasion.   That&#8217;s right, the failure of the latter was enough to turn the tide&#8211;never mind that Zhukov was getting ready to smash into Poland.  </p>
<p>Also, Joe Kennedy was sanitized from the somewhat Nazi-sympathetic right bastard that he was in the book (and in real life).  In the book, the reader was left hanging at the end before the Hitler-Kennedy summit ever took place, with it remaining an entirely open question whether photographic evidence of the Holocaust would change Joe&#8217;s mind or simply provide fuel for some chuckles over cocktails with Hitler.  In the movie Joe sees the pictures,  starts weeping like Iron Eyes Cody at the sight of somebody littering, and orders his drive to turn the car around and leave Berlin.</p>
<p>Apparently the producer thought American audiences would be too fucking stupid to stand seeing a Kennedy&#8211;even a dirtbag like Joe&#8211;as friendly to Hitler.  Shit!  In real life, Joe Kennedy and Prescott Bush were probably fighting each other to steal the crematorium contract from I.G. Farben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G.</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357438</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357438</guid>
		<description>Roderick, I&#039;m a little disappointed that you did a review of this movie, before posting one about Iron Man 2.  Is it your DC Comics bias? ;-)

Richard G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roderick, I&#8217;m a little disappointed that you did a review of this movie, before posting one about Iron Man 2.  Is it your DC Comics bias? <img src='http://aaeblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Richard G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357436</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357436</guid>
		<description>I would only have seen it for the soundtrack done by my favorite band Mastodon, but since some of it has been released (and more is supposed to be released), I have no reason to see the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would only have seen it for the soundtrack done by my favorite band Mastodon, but since some of it has been released (and more is supposed to be released), I have no reason to see the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher George</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357429</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 21:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357429</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Not &quot;pointless,&quot; just not relevant to the plot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Not &#8220;pointless,&#8221; just not relevant to the plot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357426</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 19:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357426</guid>
		<description>Not having seen the film, I can only imagine that Megan Fox running around in her underwear is a feature, not a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not having seen the film, I can only imagine that Megan Fox running around in her underwear is a feature, not a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Echoes and Mirrors &#187; Daily Links</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/07/04/jonah-sux/comment-page-1/#comment-357424</link>
		<dc:creator>Echoes and Mirrors &#187; Daily Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 18:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5656#comment-357424</guid>
		<description>[...] Reader: Jonah Sux Well, shit. I had been looking forward to this. Looks like I’m saving $10.    var a2a_config [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reader: Jonah Sux Well, shit. I had been looking forward to this. Looks like I’m saving $10.    var a2a_config [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

