<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ayncyclopedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:17:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356976</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356976</guid>
		<description>Well, she evidently qualifies according to the SEP.  YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, she evidently qualifies according to the SEP.  YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon73</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356972</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356972</guid>
		<description>With the publication of this article does Ayn Rand now qualify as a &quot;serious&quot; thinker in philosophy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the publication of this article does Ayn Rand now qualify as a &#8220;serious&#8221; thinker in philosophy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356971</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356971</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that, and Bradford raises some good questions; but I don&#039;t find his grounds (mostly &lt;em&gt;ex silentio&lt;/em&gt;) for dismissing Ferrara&#039;s testimony as convincing as he seems to. (Incidentally, an interview with Ferrara appears on the &lt;em&gt;We the Living&lt;/em&gt; dvd.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read that, and Bradford raises some good questions; but I don&#8217;t find his grounds (mostly <em>ex silentio</em>) for dismissing Ferrara&#8217;s testimony as convincing as he seems to. (Incidentally, an interview with Ferrara appears on the <em>We the Living</em> dvd.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356970</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356970</guid>
		<description>Only two paragraphs (an unhappy choice but our space was limited -- and if something has to be shortchanged, that&#039;s always it).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only two paragraphs (an unhappy choice but our space was limited &#8212; and if something has to be shortchanged, that&#8217;s always it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edvard V.</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356969</link>
		<dc:creator>Edvard V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356969</guid>
		<description>William Bradford wrote a piece in Liberty some years ago that casts considerable doubt on the story that the Italian film version of We the Living was banned by the Fascist government.

http://www.libertyunbound.com/article.php?id=260</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Bradford wrote a piece in Liberty some years ago that casts considerable doubt on the story that the Italian film version of We the Living was banned by the Fascist government.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.libertyunbound.com/article.php?id=260" rel="nofollow">http://www.libertyunbound.com/article.php?id=260</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356967</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356967</guid>
		<description>How much got devoted to aesthetics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much got devoted to aesthetics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2010/06/08/ayncyclopedia/comment-page-1/#comment-356966</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=5488#comment-356966</guid>
		<description>P.S. - Our bibliography may seem a bit eccentric, in that some of the items we left out are clearly more important than some of the items we included.   True, but not exactly our preference.  Our initial bibliography was much more complete, but we were asked by the editors to cut it down; then after we&#039;d cut it down, an anonymous referee asked us to add more secondary-lit citations on certain particular points, so the bibliography got &lt;em&gt;selectively&lt;/em&gt; re-expanded. &lt;em&gt;Hinc illæ lachrymæ&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. &#8211; Our bibliography may seem a bit eccentric, in that some of the items we left out are clearly more important than some of the items we included.   True, but not exactly our preference.  Our initial bibliography was much more complete, but we were asked by the editors to cut it down; then after we&#8217;d cut it down, an anonymous referee asked us to add more secondary-lit citations on certain particular points, so the bibliography got <em>selectively</em> re-expanded. <em>Hinc illæ lachrymæ</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

