Rand Unbound, Part 7

3rdFeb. × ’10

Two more Cato Unbound posts from me, one a reply to Mike’s latest on whether it’s conceptually incoherent to be indifferent to one’s own interests, and one a belated response to Doug’s earlier question about religion.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

2 Comments

  1. Posted February 3, 2010 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Chromium 4.0.249.43 Linux

    I don’t see how your approach doesn’t lift the concept as high as imaginable. Regardless of one’s particular religion.

    Whenever I have theological discussions with my Christian friends, I ask them “what is God’s logic?” And that serves as a koan. But they tend to reject the question. If the word ‘Jesus’ isn’t included in the question, then it’s automatically blaspheme. I’m so glad our country has insitutionalized polylogism.

  2. NS
    Posted February 4, 2010 at 12:58 pm | Permalink