Doug Rasmussen has a piece on Ayn Rand up today on Cato Unbound as part of their online symposium on Rand. Over the next few days, Neera Badhwar, Mike Huemer, and I will be posting responses.
Search
About Roderick T. Long

The Empirical Me
I’m Roderick T. Long, Professor of Philosophy at Auburn University. I’m an Aristotelean/Wittgensteinian in philosophy and a left-libertarian market anarchist in social theory. (More about me here.) This blog, Austro-Athenian Empire, is a continuation of my earlier blog, archived here.
Recent Comments
- Graeme on Frustration.edu
- Stephan Kinsella on Neapolitan Note
- MBH on One Libertarian Seminar Ends, Another Begins
- MBH on One Libertarian Seminar Ends, Another Begins
- Roderick on Who Wrote the Discourse on Voluntary Servitude ?
- Thomas on Frustration.edu
- Roderick on Anarchy in America
- Roderick on Anarchy in America
- Roderick on Neapolitan Note
- Rad Geek on Anarchy in America
Asides
Tags
Anarchy Antiquity Antiracism Arma Virumque Boring Administrative Stuff Can't Stop the Muzak Cato Encyclopedia Conflation Debate Democracy Ethics Feminism Financial Saga Free the Earth Guest Blogs Humor Industriels IP Jove's Witnesses Labortarian Lapsus Linguae Left-Libertarian Left and Right LGBT Molinari/C4SS No Borders Online Texts Paterson Personal PI Complex Praxeology Rand Science Fact Science Fiction Space Spencer Terror Thank You Please May I Have Another Therapeutic State The Thin Blue Line Unethical PhilosophyGravatarGrid
Blogroll
- Rad Geek
- Journal of Libertarian Studies
- Industrial Radical
- Molinari Institute News
- Chris Sciabarra
- Journal of Ayn Rand Studies
- Sheldon Richman
- Brad Spangler
- Kevin Carson
- Alina Stefanescu
- Kn@ppster
- Wally Conger
- Upaya
- Joel Schlosberg
- Libertarian Labyrinth
- Freeman, Libertarian Critter
- Lady Aster
- B. K. Marcus
- Social Memory Complex
- Arthur Silber
- Adem Kupi
- CLASSical Liberalism
- Independent Country
- Geoff Plauché
- Scottish Nous
- One Small Voice
- Stefan Molyneux
- Liberty & Power
- Mises Blog
- LewRockwell.com
- LewRockwell.com Blog
- Hit and Run
- Crash Landing
- Catallarchy
- David Friedman
- Pax et Libertas
- Dead Anarchists
- Boston Tea Party
- Libertarian Party
- Grassroots Libertarians
- Libertarian Radical Caucus
- Agorism
- David M. Hart
- Carol Moore
- Molinari Institute Shop
- Psychopolitik
- After:All
- Gus diZerega
- John Markley
- Per Bylund
- Neil Parille
- Center for a Stateless Society
- Hotel Yuggoth
- Lester Hunt
- Anarchoblogs
- LeftLibertarian.org
- Alliance of the Libertarian Left
- ALL Ad Hoc Organizing Committee
- Agorist Action Alliance
- Anarchist Cafe
- Ken MacLeod
- Natalia Petrova
- Gary Chartier
July 2010June 2010May 2010April 2010March 2010February 2010January 2010December 2009November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006


I sure hope that “what’s dead in Rand’s thought” in the symposium isn’t … this:
http://www.stephankinsella.com/wp-content/uploads/texts/rockwell_tucker_rand.pdf
And this might not be important to anyone else, but it so happens that Michael Huemer is related to animator Dick Huemer, who worked for Fleischer and Disney and was a major force in developing one of animation’s earliest stars, Ko-Ko the Clown; there’s a website that covers the entire Huemer family:
http://huemer.com/index.htm
I sure hope that “what’s dead in Rand’s thought” in the symposium isn’t … this
I suspect … not exactly.
Michael Huemer is related to animator Dick Huemer
I did not know dat.
Who came first, Ko-Ko the Clown or Gertie the Dinosaur?
Joel Schlosberg-
Thank you for sharing this appalling, yet fascinating and informative, document. It’s like discovering a murder weapon.
What the Rothbard-Rockwell alliance did was to sever libertarianism from freedom of spirit and a firm relation to Enlightenment and individualism. The rebirth of the old libertarianism can never be possible without the recreation of a libertarian culture which structurally reverses that commitment. The original decapitation of libertarianism to reactionary antifederalism was made possible by libertarianism’s shallow founding in operational relativism in reaction to Ayn Rand’s impossible demands for philosophical conformity.
The mainstream of the libertarian movement is currently heading off an anti-intellectual cliff. If no one stands and refounds libertarianism- in words which can still speak to the best within us- then the ideal is likely to perish from history when the American Republic’s individualist legacy fades from living memory. Left-libertarianism can only do this if a commitment to broadly Enlightenment and liberal values becomes incorporated into its written or unwritten constitution. This has not occurred.
Rockwell and Tucker write:
As Pius IX wrote in his Syllabus of Errors, “the civil authority” must not interfere “in matters relating to religion, morality, and spiritual government.”
I think this is a misinterpretation. Here is the original passage from the Syllabus:
44. The civil authority may interfere in matters relating to religion, morality and spiritual government: hence, it can pass judgment on the instructions issued for the guidance of consciences, conformably with their mission, by the pastors of the Church. Further, it has the right to make enactments regarding the administration of the divine sacraments, and the dispositions necessary for receiving them.
Pius IX rejected state interference “in matters relating to religion, morality and spiritual government” only if it was directed against the Catholic Church. Here are some other alleged “errors” condemned in the Syllabus:
15. Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true. [...]
55. The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church. [...]
62. The principle of non-intervention, as it is called, ought to be proclaimed and observed. [...]
77. In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship. [...]
78. Hence it has been wisely decided by law, in some Catholic countries, that persons coming to reside therein shall enjoy the public exercise of their own peculiar worship. [...]
79. Moreover, it is false that the civil liberty of every form of worship, and the full power, given to all, of overtly and publicly manifesting any opinions whatsoever and thoughts, conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism.
Then there’s this.