<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agreement in Judgments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354271</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354271</guid>
		<description>No, no, it&#039;s just their fictional character who&#039;s arrogant.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, no, it&#8217;s just their fictional character who&#8217;s arrogant.  <img src='http://aaeblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.M.Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354269</link>
		<dc:creator>P.M.Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354269</guid>
		<description>Had it been a short list, that claim would have been justified; as it was, it was absurdly arrogant on the part of the site&#039;s designers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had it been a short list, that claim would have been justified; as it was, it was absurdly arrogant on the part of the site&#8217;s designers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354232</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354232</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pretty close&quot; means your choice was on the long list he gives you at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pretty close&#8221; means your choice was on the long list he gives you at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.M.Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354226</link>
		<dc:creator>P.M.Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354226</guid>
		<description>Ha! Not only did it guess wrong three times for Benjamin Disraeli before it gave up, offering Oscar Wilde, Robert Browning and Lord Dunsany even though it had been told he was a 19th century British Prime Minister of Jewish origins, it had the nerve to claim it had been pretty close. It seems its early question whether he was a writer confused it permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Not only did it guess wrong three times for Benjamin Disraeli before it gave up, offering Oscar Wilde, Robert Browning and Lord Dunsany even though it had been told he was a 19th century British Prime Minister of Jewish origins, it had the nerve to claim it had been pretty close. It seems its early question whether he was a writer confused it permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWW</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354213</link>
		<dc:creator>RWW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354213</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s basically just a specialized version of 20Q...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s basically just a specialized version of 20Q&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles H.</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354212</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354212</guid>
		<description>I was thinking of Immanuel Kant and it gave me Friedrich Nietzsche, even though I told it no mustache.  Also I didn&#039;t know whether Kant had ever killed anyone.  And I said he was &quot;ugly and nasty,&quot; though really I was just thinking of his prose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking of Immanuel Kant and it gave me Friedrich Nietzsche, even though I told it no mustache.  Also I didn&#8217;t know whether Kant had ever killed anyone.  And I said he was &#8220;ugly and nasty,&#8221; though really I was just thinking of his prose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354210</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354210</guid>
		<description>And it also relies on people telling the truth and not messing with it.

&lt;i&gt;a related character from the same TV show&lt;/i&gt;

I tried Ken MacLeod and got Iain Banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it also relies on people telling the truth and not messing with it.</p>
<p><i>a related character from the same TV show</i></p>
<p>I tried Ken MacLeod and got Iain Banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raven</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354206</link>
		<dc:creator>Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354206</guid>
		<description>I was surprised when it got David Lynch on the first try, but I defeated it with El Topo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was surprised when it got David Lynch on the first try, but I defeated it with El Topo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon73</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354204</guid>
		<description>Yes that&#039;s what I was implying;  it also relies on people entering in their character once they have defeated it.  I beat it just now by using a minor character from a TV show, although its guess was surprisingly close (a related character from the same TV show).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes that&#8217;s what I was implying;  it also relies on people entering in their character once they have defeated it.  I beat it just now by using a minor character from a TV show, although its guess was surprisingly close (a related character from the same TV show).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/21/agreement-in-judgments/comment-page-1/#comment-354203</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4099#comment-354203</guid>
		<description>Another note: it doesn&#039;t go strictly by your answers (you may say female and it will still guess a male or vice versa); I&#039;d guess it goes by overall correlation, i.e., it will guess the person for whom the average answers of others have the highest overall correlation with yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another note: it doesn&#8217;t go strictly by your answers (you may say female and it will still guess a male or vice versa); I&#8217;d guess it goes by overall correlation, i.e., it will guess the person for whom the average answers of others have the highest overall correlation with yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

