<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Against Pseudo-Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 03:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natailya Petrova</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354264</link>
		<dc:creator>Natailya Petrova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354264</guid>
		<description>Re: Soviet and MBH&#039;s discussion of tax funded subsidies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Soviet and MBH&#8217;s discussion of tax funded subsidies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natailya Petrova</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354263</link>
		<dc:creator>Natailya Petrova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354263</guid>
		<description>MBH,

Provocative economistic arguments! My own take is that neutrality on government funding for medical procedures is desirable, but I hadn&#039;t considered the crowding out effects.

Charles,

I always wonder how much money every Progressive organization combined has and how much goes to the Democrats....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MBH,</p>
<p>Provocative economistic arguments! My own take is that neutrality on government funding for medical procedures is desirable, but I hadn&#8217;t considered the crowding out effects.</p>
<p>Charles,</p>
<p>I always wonder how much money every Progressive organization combined has and how much goes to the Democrats&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natailya Petrova</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354260</link>
		<dc:creator>Natailya Petrova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354260</guid>
		<description>Anonymous masses of blog readers,

The bill isn&#039;t just say taxing the super-rich. They have all these weird taxes on things like breast augmentation and existing quality insurance plans. My temporary insurance with the Teamsters through my dad&#039;s employment with them is very comfortable. I do not want to see what a 40 percent tax on it does for my healthcare. I may be considered expendable costwise by the Teamsters, because I am the child of one of their lawyers ~ not an actual employee. My parents also lost their retirement in the stock market crash, so they don&#039;t really need increased costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous masses of blog readers,</p>
<p>The bill isn&#8217;t just say taxing the super-rich. They have all these weird taxes on things like breast augmentation and existing quality insurance plans. My temporary insurance with the Teamsters through my dad&#8217;s employment with them is very comfortable. I do not want to see what a 40 percent tax on it does for my healthcare. I may be considered expendable costwise by the Teamsters, because I am the child of one of their lawyers ~ not an actual employee. My parents also lost their retirement in the stock market crash, so they don&#8217;t really need increased costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CD</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354220</link>
		<dc:creator>CD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354220</guid>
		<description>Roderick,

How happy I am to see Progressives revolting against the bill! Hope for them yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roderick,</p>
<p>How happy I am to see Progressives revolting against the bill! Hope for them yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354218</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354218</guid>
		<description>I see.  I&#039;ll accept that it&#039;s a matter of degree.  Though that still wouldn&#039;t mean that regulation = ownership.  That would just put regulation at one end of the government property spectrum and ownership at the other.  

John says, &lt;b&gt;If this passes, I’d question whether the health insurance industry would really count as “private” any more.&lt;/b&gt;

But by your understanding of the relationship between regulation and ownership, the insurance industry would never really count as private in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see.  I&#8217;ll accept that it&#8217;s a matter of degree.  Though that still wouldn&#8217;t mean that regulation = ownership.  That would just put regulation at one end of the government property spectrum and ownership at the other.  </p>
<p>John says, <b>If this passes, I’d question whether the health insurance industry would really count as “private” any more.</b></p>
<p>But by your understanding of the relationship between regulation and ownership, the insurance industry would never really count as private in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natailya Petrova</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354217</link>
		<dc:creator>Natailya Petrova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354217</guid>
		<description>Roderick,

How happy I am to see Progressives revolting against the bill! Hope for them yet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roderick,</p>
<p>How happy I am to see Progressives revolting against the bill! Hope for them yet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354214</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354214</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;An agency is &lt;u&gt;operated by&lt;/u&gt; members of the government; a business &lt;u&gt;operates through&lt;/u&gt; rules from the government.&lt;/em&gt;

But that&#039;s a tautology; it&#039;s not helpful in identifying the difference.  Obviously, Group X is part of the government if and only if it&#039;s operated by members of the government; but when one side of that biconditional is in dispute, so is the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>An agency is <u>operated by</u> members of the government; a business <u>operates through</u> rules from the government.</em></p>
<p>But that&#8217;s a tautology; it&#8217;s not helpful in identifying the difference.  Obviously, Group X is part of the government if and only if it&#8217;s operated by members of the government; but when one side of that biconditional is in dispute, so is the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aster</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354211</link>
		<dc:creator>Aster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354211</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;¿Señora Aster, que tipo de trabajo tienes?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4s4UpE2bZU&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=42A41E023D4F7537&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;index=33&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Me llaman Aster, aunque me llamo Jeanine.  La historia mía es breve.  En tela o en seda bordo, en casa y fuera.  Soy tranquila y alegre, y me distraigo haciendo lirios y rosas.&lt;/a&gt;

Buenas noches, señor filósofo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>¿Señora Aster, que tipo de trabajo tienes?</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4s4UpE2bZU&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=42A41E023D4F7537&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext_from=PL&amp;index=33" rel="nofollow">Me llaman Aster, aunque me llamo Jeanine.  La historia mía es breve.  En tela o en seda bordo, en casa y fuera.  Soy tranquila y alegre, y me distraigo haciendo lirios y rosas.</a></p>
<p>Buenas noches, señor filósofo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBH</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354205</link>
		<dc:creator>MBH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354205</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;How would you define a sharp difference between a government agency and a government-privileged, government-regulated private business?&lt;/b&gt;

An agency is &lt;i&gt;operated by&lt;/i&gt; members of the government; a business &lt;i&gt;operates through&lt;/i&gt; rules from the government.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s46T3N-CjY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; just for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>How would you define a sharp difference between a government agency and a government-privileged, government-regulated private business?</b></p>
<p>An agency is <i>operated by</i> members of the government; a business <i>operates through</i> rules from the government.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s46T3N-CjY" rel="nofollow">This</a> just for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/12/19/against-pseudo-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-354199</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=4096#comment-354199</guid>
		<description>Well, just the two prongs: under libertarianism it will be easier for people to become affluent and so be able to afford healthcare, and for those (a smaller number than now) who can&#039;t afford it, welfare programs will be better funded and more efficient.  (On this last see &lt;a href=&quot;http://libertariannation.org/a/f12l1.html#3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/journals/jls/21_2/21_2_1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, just the two prongs: under libertarianism it will be easier for people to become affluent and so be able to afford healthcare, and for those (a smaller number than now) who can&#8217;t afford it, welfare programs will be better funded and more efficient.  (On this last see <a href="http://libertariannation.org/a/f12l1.html#3" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://mises.org/journals/jls/21_2/21_2_1.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

