Amidst all the endlessly tedious media hoopla over Ted Kennedy’s death, I heard one good anecdote. During a period when Kennedy was being attacked by an opponent for never having worked a day in his life, he supposedly visited an ironworks factory where he was accosted by a labourer who asked him: “Is it true you’ve never worked a day in your life?” As Kennedy hemmed and hawed, the labourer said: “Believe me, you ain’t missed a thing.”
Which in turn reminds me of the anecdote about Queen Victoria, who supposedly said: “It must be fun to work, because it’s so much fun to watch other people work.”
Which reminds me yet further of an old New Yorker cartoon of an obviously wealthy woman lounging contentedly while, nearby, her husband (or perhaps lover) is telling a friend: “I never told her about the Depression. She would have worried.”
Tags: Humor, Labortarian, Left-Libertarian
-
I just watched Chris Matthews claim on The Colbert Report that the Kennedy brothers “created the civil rights movement”!
-
Speaking of the Depression, I was thinking about the arguments surrounding unemployment in a free market and how much unemployment that could exist. In a free society, if there were any residual unemployment then those people wouldn’t starve if they could just find some farmland and set up a community farm there. Putting aside worries about pollution (e.g. if the industrial places poisoned the environment so that everybody outside their industry starves), this doesn’t seem like a satisfactory answer though. Take the Spencer/Chomsky scenario where one private owner owns all the modern technological means of life, and everybody else must either obey him to get employment, starve, or live in a caveman-like state in the small pockets of land the private owner’s police force cannot patrol. The “marginal revenue product” of everybody but the king is zero, and so unemployment stays at 99.99% forever.
-
Anon73 – suppose we live in a world where mice are higher-dimensional beings and we’re simply a computer program.
There’s no way that that scenario could arise. It requires that:
1) No one else has any resources (already beyond that point)
2) One man could acquire EVERYTHING OUT THERE without running into opposition (how’s that going to work?)
3) No one else has any idea how to produce technology (is the one guy a mouse overlord, or something?)
4) No one would just kill his ass.-
Well options 2) and 4) are what Chomsky would advocate – but then that seems to run up against private property.
-
Comments are now closed.






6 comments