<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Molinari Symposium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353052</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353052</guid>
		<description>I will prepare to pay either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will prepare to pay either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353047</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353047</guid>
		<description>Well, you&#039;re supposed to pay the APA&#039;s registration fee (something like $60).  They have people roaming the halls doing random checks (Ihre Papiere, bitte) to see whether people attending sessions are registered, though I&#039;ve never seen such a check and I know their workforce is fairly small, so I reckon the likelihood of being able to get past this obnoxious policy is pretty good (especially since they&#039;re probably relying more heavily on their even newer policy of not releasing session location info except to registrants, an annoyance I get around by posting the info on my blog).  So, to answer your question, it costs either nothing or $60.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;re supposed to pay the APA&#8217;s registration fee (something like $60).  They have people roaming the halls doing random checks (Ihre Papiere, bitte) to see whether people attending sessions are registered, though I&#8217;ve never seen such a check and I know their workforce is fairly small, so I reckon the likelihood of being able to get past this obnoxious policy is pretty good (especially since they&#8217;re probably relying more heavily on their even newer policy of not releasing session location info except to registrants, an annoyance I get around by posting the info on my blog).  So, to answer your question, it costs either nothing or $60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353045</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353045</guid>
		<description>How much does this symposium cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much does this symposium cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353044</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353044</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That pales in comparison with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox, at least from the user’s standpoint. Firefox extensions are easy to find and install, not hosted on Google code.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Where it&#039;s hosted makes no difference to me, as a user. The point wasn&#039;t that Safariblock was as good as AdBlock, but just something to counter the claim that Safari had no adblocking ability. Of course Safariblock isn&#039;t as good as Adblock, I know from comparison. Also, Safariblock isn&#039;t the only thing out there for this.

And regarding HTML5, Ogg, etc. I recommend this (admittedly Apple-biased) piece as a supplement to other stories on the topic (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/07/decoding-the-html-5-video-codec-debate.ars&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; from Ars Technica):
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/06/ogg_theora_h_264_and_the_html_5_browser_squabble.html

I don&#039;t have much of a concern in the browser battles either way.  I use what works best for me, while at the same time experimenting with competition to make sure it works best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That pales in comparison with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox, at least from the user’s standpoint. Firefox extensions are easy to find and install, not hosted on Google code.</p></blockquote>
<p>Where it&#8217;s hosted makes no difference to me, as a user. The point wasn&#8217;t that Safariblock was as good as AdBlock, but just something to counter the claim that Safari had no adblocking ability. Of course Safariblock isn&#8217;t as good as Adblock, I know from comparison. Also, Safariblock isn&#8217;t the only thing out there for this.</p>
<p>And regarding HTML5, Ogg, etc. I recommend this (admittedly Apple-biased) piece as a supplement to other stories on the topic (like <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/07/decoding-the-html-5-video-codec-debate.ars" rel="nofollow">this one</a> from Ars Technica):<br />
<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/06/ogg_theora_h_264_and_the_html_5_browser_squabble.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/07/06/ogg_theora_h_264_and_the_html_5_browser_squabble.html</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have much of a concern in the browser battles either way.  I use what works best for me, while at the same time experimenting with competition to make sure it works best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353030</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353030</guid>
		<description>That pales in comparison with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox, at least from the user&#039;s standpoint. Firefox extensions are easy to find and install, not hosted on Google code.

The problem I have with Safari&#039;s HTML5 implementation is that it&#039;s as bad as Flash. With Flash, the browser dynamically links to libflashplayer.so and loads it if called on a webpage. The plugin can interact badly with the browser and crash it, or stop a page from working. Apple chose to implement audio/video tag support by dynamically linking to Quicktime, which is then loaded if called by a site using the audio or video tags. Also the implementation doesn&#039;t work on Windows. 
Firefox has its own built-in player, just to play audio/video from the HTML5 tags. It will work on any platform, and it also has Ogg Vorbis/Theora support built-in. By default, Quicktime does not support Ogg files at all, and that&#039;s what everybody&#039;s using these tags for.
I have problems with other browser too.
Opera 10: Passes Acid2 and Acid3, passes CSS3 selectors test, supports text-shadow and hsl colours, but doesn&#039;t support box-shadow, border-radius properties or audio/video tags.
IE8: Passes Acid2, fails all other tests, doesn&#039;t support text-shadow, box-shadow, border-radius, hsl colours, audio/video tags, or any CSS3.
Chrome: Needs to implement latest Webkit to advance to Safari&#039;s level, doesn&#039;t currently support audio/video tags.
http://techblog.procurios.nl/k/618/news/view/33224/14863/Testing-Internet-Explorer-8-CSS3-for-Web-Design.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That pales in comparison with the Adblock Plus extension for Firefox, at least from the user&#8217;s standpoint. Firefox extensions are easy to find and install, not hosted on Google code.</p>
<p>The problem I have with Safari&#8217;s HTML5 implementation is that it&#8217;s as bad as Flash. With Flash, the browser dynamically links to libflashplayer.so and loads it if called on a webpage. The plugin can interact badly with the browser and crash it, or stop a page from working. Apple chose to implement audio/video tag support by dynamically linking to Quicktime, which is then loaded if called by a site using the audio or video tags. Also the implementation doesn&#8217;t work on Windows.<br />
Firefox has its own built-in player, just to play audio/video from the HTML5 tags. It will work on any platform, and it also has Ogg Vorbis/Theora support built-in. By default, Quicktime does not support Ogg files at all, and that&#8217;s what everybody&#8217;s using these tags for.<br />
I have problems with other browser too.<br />
Opera 10: Passes Acid2 and Acid3, passes CSS3 selectors test, supports text-shadow and hsl colours, but doesn&#8217;t support box-shadow, border-radius properties or audio/video tags.<br />
IE8: Passes Acid2, fails all other tests, doesn&#8217;t support text-shadow, box-shadow, border-radius, hsl colours, audio/video tags, or any CSS3.<br />
Chrome: Needs to implement latest Webkit to advance to Safari&#8217;s level, doesn&#8217;t currently support audio/video tags.<br />
<a href="http://techblog.procurios.nl/k/618/news/view/33224/14863/Testing-Internet-Explorer-8-CSS3-for-Web-Design.html" rel="nofollow">http://techblog.procurios.nl/k/618/news/view/33224/14863/Testing-Internet-Explorer-8-CSS3-for-Web-Design.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: 2009 Molinari Society Symposium: &#34;Intellectual Property: Is it Legitimate?&#34;</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353029</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Report &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is IP Property: 2009 Molinari Society Symposium: &#34;Intellectual Property: Is it Legitimate?&#34;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353029</guid>
		<description>[...] Against Monopoly As reported by Roderick Long: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Against Monopoly As reported by Roderick Long: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353026</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353026</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;is that the same Robert Schaeffer, skeptic, UFO-debunker, Randian (?), and author of Resentment Against Achievement?&lt;/i&gt;

Nope, this guy is Schaefer while the &lt;i&gt;Resentment Against Achievement&lt;/i&gt; is Sheaffer.

&lt;i&gt;Wish I could be a fly on the wall!&lt;/i&gt;

Are you a self-hating human?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is that the same Robert Schaeffer, skeptic, UFO-debunker, Randian (?), and author of Resentment Against Achievement?</i></p>
<p>Nope, this guy is Schaefer while the <i>Resentment Against Achievement</i> is Sheaffer.</p>
<p><i>Wish I could be a fly on the wall!</i></p>
<p>Are you a self-hating human?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Molinari Society Symposium: “Intellectual Property: Is it Legitimate?”</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353025</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Molinari Society Symposium: “Intellectual Property: Is it Legitimate?”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353025</guid>
		<description>[...] As reported by Roderick Long: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As reported by Roderick Long: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Kinsella</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353024</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Kinsella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353024</guid>
		<description>Interesting--is that the same Robert Schaeffer, skeptic, UFO-debunker, Randian (?), and author of &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Resentment-Against-Achievement-Understanding-Assault/dp/0879754478/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1249711520&amp;sr=8-1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Resentment Against Achievement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;? Curious to hear what ensues. Wish I could be a fly on the wall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8211;is that the same Robert Schaeffer, skeptic, UFO-debunker, Randian (?), and author of <i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Resentment-Against-Achievement-Understanding-Assault/dp/0879754478/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1249711520&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">Resentment Against Achievement</a></i>? Curious to hear what ensues. Wish I could be a fly on the wall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2009/08/07/2009-molinari-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-353023</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aaeblog.com/?p=3338#comment-353023</guid>
		<description>http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/

&amp;

http://webkit.org/blog/140/html5-media-support/

Of course WebKit is just a preview of what&#039;s coming, but there has been underlying support for things for a while, also Safariblock isn&#039;t the only AdBlocking thing out there.

Firefox is still fine for use though, just not my first choice on my machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/safariblock/</a></p>
<p>&amp;</p>
<p><a href="http://webkit.org/blog/140/html5-media-support/" rel="nofollow">http://webkit.org/blog/140/html5-media-support/</a></p>
<p>Of course WebKit is just a preview of what&#8217;s coming, but there has been underlying support for things for a while, also Safariblock isn&#8217;t the only AdBlocking thing out there.</p>
<p>Firefox is still fine for use though, just not my first choice on my machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

