Of course, I agree. Great point.

And I don’t know if this is similar–but the way black libertarian/conservative types are treated is despicable. If they oppose affirmative action–based in part on the argument that it tends to make people attribute genuine individual success to the aff action policy–they are accused of being ingrates… i.e, the leftist does exactly what the argument accuses them of. It’s a disgusting attempt to stifle debate: to foist a system on people, that then prevents them from even arguing against it. It makes my (horrible, racist, white) scin crawl.

1. If you charge too little, it’s predatory price cutting (attempting to monopolize);

2. If you charge too much, you are obviously abusing a monopoly power you’ve managed to achieve;

3. If you charge the same as your competitors, it’s collusion.

One wonders why he doesn’t think it’s so incriminating that Green, Spooner and Tolstoy refused to call themselves anarchists.

And of course, there’s no mention of Proudhon’s more “capitalistic” contemporary, the self-proclaimed anarchist Anselme Bellegarrigue.

Interesting also that even though he puts things in block quotes, he never seems to be able to just quote the text straight through. He always has to break it up into sentence fragments and insert his own words in between, which has been found to change the original meaning on several occasions.

For some reason their symbol seems to be the fascist logo… hmm. Website: http://www.westernyouth.org/