
The Empirical Me
I’m Roderick T. Long, Professor of Philosophy at Auburn University. I’m an Aristotelean/Wittgensteinian in philosophy and a left-libertarian market anarchist in social theory. (More about me here.) This blog, Austro-Athenian Empire, is a continuation of my earlier blog, archived here.
Anarchy Lapsus Linguae No Borders PI Complex Left and Right Antiracism Praxeology Online Texts Elseblogs Left-Libertarian Industriels Molinari/C4SS Humor Therapeutic State Space Jove's Witnesses Ethics Boring Administrative Stuff Conflation Debate Unethical Philosophy LGBT Arma Virumque Science Fiction Terror The Thin Blue Line Feminism Paterson Financial Saga Spencer Antiquity Rand Labortarian Free the Earth Resistance Is Not Futile Democracy Guest Blogs Can't Stop the Muzak Juvenilia Cato Encyclopedia Science Fact Personal Thank You Please May I Have Another IP
Copyright © 2012 Austro-Athenian Empire.
“The Comedian is dead.”
Roderick, if you were aruguing with Jon on Mars, what would you have told him? I suppose that he would say that it that the events that were to follow were inevitable. But you’ve argued in favor of the free will hypothesis, and (if I recall correctly) that the deterministic theory is incoherent.
It’d just be good to see a review of Watchmen from a libertarian philosopher’s perspective.
Jon’s situation as described is incoherent — “I’m deciding to do X because I see that X is already what’s going to happen.” The direction of fit is messed up.
Oh by the way, here’s the essay of mine on why I think determinism is incoherent.
There is a book, Watchmen and Philosophy: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watchmen-Philosophy-Rorschach-Blackwell-Culture/dp/0470396857/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234045247&sr=8-1
That’s a silly position. Free will cannot exist without determinism.
OK, I’ll bite; what’s the argument?
If determined how is will free?