
The Empirical Me
I’m Roderick T. Long, Professor of Philosophy at Auburn University. I’m an Aristotelean/Wittgensteinian in philosophy and a left-libertarian market anarchist in social theory. (More about me here.) This blog, Austro-Athenian Empire, is a continuation of my earlier blog, archived here.
Space Humor Elseblogs Science Fiction Thank You Please May I Have Another Left-Libertarian Labortarian Democracy Can't Stop the Muzak Jove's Witnesses Anarchy LGBT Conflation Debate Juvenilia Lapsus Linguae Feminism Unethical Philosophy Free the Earth Rand The Thin Blue Line Cato Encyclopedia Therapeutic State Paterson Arma Virumque Online Texts Praxeology Molinari/C4SS Left and Right Terror Personal Spencer Industriels Resistance Is Not Futile Guest Blogs Antiquity Ethics Science Fact No Borders Antiracism Boring Administrative Stuff IP Financial Saga PI Complex
Copyright © 2012 Austro-Athenian Empire.
“The Comedian is dead.”
Roderick, if you were aruguing with Jon on Mars, what would you have told him? I suppose that he would say that it that the events that were to follow were inevitable. But you’ve argued in favor of the free will hypothesis, and (if I recall correctly) that the deterministic theory is incoherent.
It’d just be good to see a review of Watchmen from a libertarian philosopher’s perspective.
Jon’s situation as described is incoherent — “I’m deciding to do X because I see that X is already what’s going to happen.” The direction of fit is messed up.
Oh by the way, here’s the essay of mine on why I think determinism is incoherent.
There is a book, Watchmen and Philosophy: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Watchmen-Philosophy-Rorschach-Blackwell-Culture/dp/0470396857/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234045247&sr=8-1
That’s a silly position. Free will cannot exist without determinism.
OK, I’ll bite; what’s the argument?
If determined how is will free?