<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging the Encyclopedia, Part 1: Who Wrote What</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:32:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-280348</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-280348</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The “R” in “R”obert McDondald was left out. &lt;/i&gt;

hanks.  &#039;ve ixed he istake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The “R” in “R”obert McDondald was left out. </i></p>
<p>hanks.  &#8216;ve ixed he istake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-280265</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-280265</guid>
		<description>Also, I wanted to add something I should&#039;ve written after I first read this post:

They should&#039;ve gone all the way to Z by asking Roderick to include an entry on the &quot;Zaxlebax Problem&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I wanted to add something I should&#8217;ve written after I first read this post:</p>
<p>They should&#8217;ve gone all the way to Z by asking Roderick to include an entry on the &#8220;Zaxlebax Problem&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-280253</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-280253</guid>
		<description>The &quot;R&quot; in &quot;R&quot;obert McDondald was left out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;R&#8221; in &#8220;R&#8221;obert McDondald was left out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quasibill</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-280070</link>
		<dc:creator>quasibill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-280070</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...might have to buy it just to look at Stringham&#039;s entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;might have to buy it just to look at Stringham&#8217;s entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toban</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-279927</link>
		<dc:creator>Toban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-279927</guid>
		<description>Roderick, have you considered using FeedBurner to manage your RSS? I&#039;m an RSS follower, but I don&#039;t want to give up my Google Reader because of RSS glitches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roderick, have you considered using FeedBurner to manage your RSS? I&#8217;m an RSS follower, but I don&#8217;t want to give up my Google Reader because of RSS glitches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-279600</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-279600</guid>
		<description>Yeah, my code has been hacked in various ways and my RSS feeds suffer as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, my code has been hacked in various ways and my RSS feeds suffer as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-279447</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-279447</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve learned to just come here for blog updates rather than rely on the Google Reader.  The links for this site haven&#039;t been update in half a month I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned to just come here for blog updates rather than rely on the Google Reader.  The links for this site haven&#8217;t been update in half a month I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-278957</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-278957</guid>
		<description>Looking through that page of edits was painful--maybe one just can&#039;t go more than three paragraphs without finding something to edit.

Oh, by the way, your RSS feed just coughed up the last week&#039;s worth of entries all at once. I wouldn&#039;t want you to think that we RSS followers were snubbing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking through that page of edits was painful&#8211;maybe one just can&#8217;t go more than three paragraphs without finding something to edit.</p>
<p>Oh, by the way, your RSS feed just coughed up the last week&#8217;s worth of entries all at once. I wouldn&#8217;t want you to think that we RSS followers were snubbing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jehosophat</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-278955</link>
		<dc:creator>Jehosophat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-278955</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with Valentyne/Steiner?  I&#039;ll take Steiner over American leftists who get their metaphysics from the table scraps of Marx any day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with Valentyne/Steiner?  I&#8217;ll take Steiner over American leftists who get their metaphysics from the table scraps of Marx any day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/comment-page-1/#comment-278797</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/10/28/blogging-the-encyclopedia-part-1-who-wrote-what/#comment-278797</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;what did you think of Smith’s entry on Herbert Spencer?&lt;/i&gt;

I haven’t read it yet, but I would expect it to be good; George Smith was doing Spencer anti-defamation work long before I was.

&lt;i&gt;Chris Sciabarra is not the right person to write the entries on Nathaniel Branden and Ayn Rand. &lt;/i&gt;

He seems like a good choice to me.  But who would you suggest?

&lt;i&gt;The omission of Konkin and agorism is a disgrace. I can only hope that Wendy mentioned them in the voluntarism entry.&lt;/i&gt;

No, Wendy’s post really is about voluntarism, not about voluntaryism.

&lt;i&gt;I lean more toward the idea that they chose to use American Indian out of respect for the somewhat libertarian spirited American Indian Movement&lt;/i&gt;

Hmm, could be.  And I hope so.  The fact that they also changed my gender-neutral language to men-talk is probably what inclined me to suppose otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>what did you think of Smith’s entry on Herbert Spencer?</i></p>
<p>I haven’t read it yet, but I would expect it to be good; George Smith was doing Spencer anti-defamation work long before I was.</p>
<p><i>Chris Sciabarra is not the right person to write the entries on Nathaniel Branden and Ayn Rand. </i></p>
<p>He seems like a good choice to me.  But who would you suggest?</p>
<p><i>The omission of Konkin and agorism is a disgrace. I can only hope that Wendy mentioned them in the voluntarism entry.</i></p>
<p>No, Wendy’s post really is about voluntarism, not about voluntaryism.</p>
<p><i>I lean more toward the idea that they chose to use American Indian out of respect for the somewhat libertarian spirited American Indian Movement</i></p>
<p>Hmm, could be.  And I hope so.  The fact that they also changed my gender-neutral language to men-talk is probably what inclined me to suppose otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
