<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pootmop!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-172366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-172366</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;His claim would imply that everyone has a right to have their product purchased by somebody!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;


Sounds more like an ethnic blackmarket gang than a socialist... er, wait nevermind.


The &lt;i&gt;Atlas Shrugged 2: Shrug Harder&lt;/i&gt; satire bit that got some attention a while back made me think Rand was actually the one writing satire on socialist means. 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;You want a boycott? Here you go punks.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;His claim would imply that everyone has a right to have their product purchased by somebody!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Sounds more like an ethnic blackmarket gang than a socialist&#8230; er, wait nevermind.</p>
<p>The <i>Atlas Shrugged 2: Shrug Harder</i> satire bit that got some attention a while back made me think Rand was actually the one writing satire on socialist means. </p>
<p><i>&#8220;You want a boycott? Here you go punks.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon73</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-169107</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-169107</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Did anyone dare ask the socialist how simply declining to purchase someone’s goods or services qualifies as “coercion”?&lt;/i&gt;

Actually no, but I just figured it was par for the course for leftists. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Did anyone dare ask the socialist how simply declining to purchase someone’s goods or services qualifies as “coercion”?</i></p>
<p>Actually no, but I just figured it was par for the course for leftists. <img src='http://aaeblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168928</guid>
		<description>I always assumed &quot;capitalist&quot; meant someone that sang a soothing song for a crying child because they could.

But cereal, Kevin Carson&#039;s term Vulgartarian is most useful for this debate.


How many Capitalists think they earned the right to property just because they &quot;did something?&quot; That, for me, is the Vulgartarian credo: I DID WORK, I EARNED IT!!!

Karen DeCoster works for a 100% libertarian company I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always assumed &#8220;capitalist&#8221; meant someone that sang a soothing song for a crying child because they could.</p>
<p>But cereal, Kevin Carson&#8217;s term Vulgartarian is most useful for this debate.</p>
<p>How many Capitalists think they earned the right to property just because they &#8220;did something?&#8221; That, for me, is the Vulgartarian credo: I DID WORK, I EARNED IT!!!</p>
<p>Karen DeCoster works for a 100% libertarian company I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Bloke</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168474</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Bloke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168474</guid>
		<description>I like the term Catallaxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the term Catallaxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kaercher</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168472</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kaercher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168472</guid>
		<description>Anon73: Did anyone dare ask the socialist how simply declining to purchase someone&#039;s goods or services qualifies as &quot;coercion&quot;? His claim would imply that everyone has a right to have their product purchased by somebody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon73: Did anyone dare ask the socialist how simply declining to purchase someone&#8217;s goods or services qualifies as &#8220;coercion&#8221;? His claim would imply that everyone has a right to have their product purchased by somebody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon73</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168412</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168412</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I heard a socialist give a talk where he explicitly referred to boycotts as a form of &#039;coercion&#039;. So I guess the terminological disputes can&#039;t be resolved that easily Bob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I heard a socialist give a talk where he explicitly referred to boycotts as a form of &#8216;coercion&#8217;. So I guess the terminological disputes can&#8217;t be resolved that easily Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168284</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168284</guid>
		<description>&quot;Free market pluralist&quot;, eh?  I kinda like that.  Thanks for sharing that, Bob!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Free market pluralist&#8221;, eh?  I kinda like that.  Thanks for sharing that, Bob!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Kaercher</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-168271</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Kaercher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-168271</guid>
		<description>Karl Hess used the term &quot;free market pluralist&quot; in his autobiography &#039;Mostly On the Edge,&#039; which I think is a term that best suits my own views on this discussion. Exchange between people can happen in a very wide array of forms as diverse as humanity itself, some of which can be characterized as &quot;capitalist&quot; OR &quot;socialist.&quot; 

But as far as I&#039;m concerned, call what you like capitalism or socialism and promote it to your heart&#039;s content, just so long as there&#039;s no initiation of force or coercion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl Hess used the term &#8220;free market pluralist&#8221; in his autobiography &#8216;Mostly On the Edge,&#8217; which I think is a term that best suits my own views on this discussion. Exchange between people can happen in a very wide array of forms as diverse as humanity itself, some of which can be characterized as &#8220;capitalist&#8221; OR &#8220;socialist.&#8221; </p>
<p>But as far as I&#8217;m concerned, call what you like capitalism or socialism and promote it to your heart&#8217;s content, just so long as there&#8217;s no initiation of force or coercion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinsky</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-167856</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-167856</guid>
		<description>Hell, I won&#039;t even make any claims about what other socialists accept. It&#039;s just &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; definition, and it (WOOTMOP) is one of the core socialist ideals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, I won&#8217;t even make any claims about what other socialists accept. It&#8217;s just <i>my</i> definition, and it (WOOTMOP) is one of the core socialist ideals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinsky</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2008/06/27/pootmop/comment-page-2/#comment-167855</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2008/06/27/pootmop/#comment-167855</guid>
		<description>*universal definition of socialism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*universal definition of socialism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
