<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burke&#8217;s Semi-serious Anarchism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-47934</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-47934</guid>
		<description>See this &lt;a href=&quot;http://aaeblog.com/2007/11/08/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism-part-2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;follow-up&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See this <a href="http://aaeblog.com/2007/11/08/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism-part-2" rel="nofollow">follow-up</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Allan Plauche</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-44939</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Allan Plauche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-44939</guid>
		<description>Perhaps something similar could be said for Etienne de la Boetie&#039;s Discourse of Voluntary Servitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps something similar could be said for Etienne de la Boetie&#8217;s Discourse of Voluntary Servitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon Richman</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-44699</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-44699</guid>
		<description>Maybe Burke was floating an intellectual balloon to see what kind of attacks it would draw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Burke was floating an intellectual balloon to see what kind of attacks it would draw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-43914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-43914</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to think about this as well as More&#039;s &quot;Utopia&quot;. The scholars argue about whether or not they are satire or not, and the consensus seems to be that they are.

It&#039;s interesting to note, then, that political satirist extraordinaire Stephen Colbert has admitted that some (though very few) of the things he says &quot;satirically&quot; are things he actually believes. He just doesnt&#039; feel his audience needs to know the difference.

I imagine Burke was doing the same thing- mixing a satirical attack on deism with some genuine political sentiments presented in a satirical fashion, allowing the reader just enough room for individual interpretation that Burke himself won&#039;t get into trouble for expressing unpopular views. I imagine More&#039;s &quot;Utopia&quot; was much the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to think about this as well as More&#8217;s &#8220;Utopia&#8221;. The scholars argue about whether or not they are satire or not, and the consensus seems to be that they are.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to note, then, that political satirist extraordinaire Stephen Colbert has admitted that some (though very few) of the things he says &#8220;satirically&#8221; are things he actually believes. He just doesnt&#8217; feel his audience needs to know the difference.</p>
<p>I imagine Burke was doing the same thing- mixing a satirical attack on deism with some genuine political sentiments presented in a satirical fashion, allowing the reader just enough room for individual interpretation that Burke himself won&#8217;t get into trouble for expressing unpopular views. I imagine More&#8217;s &#8220;Utopia&#8221; was much the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Sproul</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-43133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Sproul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-43133</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!  This changes my opinion of Burke completely.  However, if he really was an anarchist, it&#039;s almost worse knowing that he betrayed his principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!  This changes my opinion of Burke completely.  However, if he really was an anarchist, it&#8217;s almost worse knowing that he betrayed his principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheldon Richman</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-43043</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheldon Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-43043</guid>
		<description>Great quote by Burke on anarchy in Massachusetts. It nearly vindicates my calling my incipient rock band the Rockingham Whigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great quote by Burke on anarchy in Massachusetts. It nearly vindicates my calling my incipient rock band the Rockingham Whigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/comment-page-1/#comment-42844</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/10/24/burkes-semi-serious-anarchism/#comment-42844</guid>
		<description>P.S. - I note that it seems to have been mainly the treatment of the &lt;i&gt;Irish&lt;/i&gt; that roused Burke&#039;s libertarian sentiments. I&#039;m reminded of the medieval historian Gerald of Wales, who in recounting the English conquest of &lt;i&gt;Ireland&lt;/i&gt; was all rah-rah for the English putting down those Irish savages, but when he discussed the English conquest of &lt;i&gt;Wales&lt;/i&gt; his enthusiasm was much more muted, and he included a list of ways that the Welsh could more effectually resist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. &#8211; I note that it seems to have been mainly the treatment of the <i>Irish</i> that roused Burke&#8217;s libertarian sentiments. I&#8217;m reminded of the medieval historian Gerald of Wales, who in recounting the English conquest of <i>Ireland</i> was all rah-rah for the English putting down those Irish savages, but when he discussed the English conquest of <i>Wales</i> his enthusiasm was much more muted, and he included a list of ways that the Welsh could more effectually resist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

