<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emerson on Anarchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/</link>
	<description>&#34;Austro&#34; as in Rothbard and Wittgenstein, &#34;Athenian&#34; as in Aristotle and smashing-the-plutocracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Garner</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17218</guid>
		<description>May I suggest that the private actors may well have been more proportionate in their response than &quot;the law&quot; as such would have been?  Given enforcement costs, many people believe that deals are more likely than shoot-outs, under such circumstances.  One other thing I have always found interesting is the relatively decent and humane manner in which most of the settlers dealt with the Indians - not to say they were perfect, of course, but trade, intermarriage, etc. were common during the early settlement - compared to the brutal wars of aggression carried out by the state.  (I am fully aware that the state was often carrying out the wars on behalf of the settlers, and that often settlement followed war, but the record is still that the settlers, in their individual capacity, tended to be pretty decent.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest that the private actors may well have been more proportionate in their response than &#8220;the law&#8221; as such would have been?  Given enforcement costs, many people believe that deals are more likely than shoot-outs, under such circumstances.  One other thing I have always found interesting is the relatively decent and humane manner in which most of the settlers dealt with the Indians &#8211; not to say they were perfect, of course, but trade, intermarriage, etc. were common during the early settlement &#8211; compared to the brutal wars of aggression carried out by the state.  (I am fully aware that the state was often carrying out the wars on behalf of the settlers, and that often settlement followed war, but the record is still that the settlers, in their individual capacity, tended to be pretty decent.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17183</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17183</guid>
		<description>To see &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt; Emerson was talking about, take a look at the two articles that I link to from the words &quot;perfect peace&quot; and &quot;reigned.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see <i>what</i> Emerson was talking about, take a look at the two articles that I link to from the words &#8220;perfect peace&#8221; and &#8220;reigned.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio Méndez</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio Méndez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>&quot;Every man throughout the country was armed with knife and revolver, and it was known that instant justice would be administered to each offence, and perfect peace reigned. &quot; 

Hmmm..this doesnt sound like my ideal of justice in an anarchist society....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Every man throughout the country was armed with knife and revolver, and it was known that instant justice would be administered to each offence, and perfect peace reigned. &#8221; </p>
<p>Hmmm..this doesnt sound like my ideal of justice in an anarchist society&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dain</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17051</link>
		<dc:creator>Dain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17051</guid>
		<description>Anon2,

The idea that peace would reign if any minor offense were corrected by a firearm would seem to be counter-inuitive. That is, any society wherein a small, harmless trespass or theft of a loaf of bread resulted in the death penalty would not be the more or less tranquil place that Emerson is describing. The idea of proportionate justice is rich in common law, and informs the ideas we still have today about appropriate punishment.

Without knowing the details of what Emerson is talking about when referring to justice, I doubt he means anything Klingon-esque as you are suggesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon2,</p>
<p>The idea that peace would reign if any minor offense were corrected by a firearm would seem to be counter-inuitive. That is, any society wherein a small, harmless trespass or theft of a loaf of bread resulted in the death penalty would not be the more or less tranquil place that Emerson is describing. The idea of proportionate justice is rich in common law, and informs the ideas we still have today about appropriate punishment.</p>
<p>Without knowing the details of what Emerson is talking about when referring to justice, I doubt he means anything Klingon-esque as you are suggesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn P. Wilbur</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17041</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn P. Wilbur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17041</guid>
		<description>Nice find. This is one of the earliest positive uses of the term in the U. S. that I&#039;m aware of, five years before Eliphalet Kimball&#039;s &quot;Boston Investigator&quot; pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice find. This is one of the earliest positive uses of the term in the U. S. that I&#8217;m aware of, five years before Eliphalet Kimball&#8217;s &#8220;Boston Investigator&#8221; pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon2</title>
		<link>http://aaeblog.com/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-17001</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://praxeology.net/blog/2007/07/11/emerson-on-anarchy/#comment-17001</guid>
		<description>I can certainly imagine peace reigning if any offense is immediately &quot;corrected&quot; by administering justice with a revolver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can certainly imagine peace reigning if any offense is immediately &#8220;corrected&#8221; by administering justice with a revolver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

